Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 19;112(46):14224–14229. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506451112

Table 1.

Tests of statistical significance for effects of birth-order on intelligence and personality

Trait Between-family analyses Within-family analyses
Combined sample NCDS NLSY* SOEP Combined sample NLSY* SOEP
F P F P F P F P F P F P F P
Intelligence (IQ) 11.80 <0.001 10.40 <0.001 3.87 0.009 2.69 0.045 11.82 <0.001
Extraversion 0.62 0.600 1.10 0.346 1.50 0.212 1.53 0.204 1.87 0.132 1.88 0.131 0.22 0.883
Emotional stability 0.57 0.638 0.93 0.427 0.43 0.729 0.65 0.584 1.17 0.319 0.12 0.946 2.24 0.083
Agreeableness 0.26 0.858 1.51 0.209 0.77 0.512 2.11 0.096 0.76 0.517 0.90 0.442 0.42 0.740
Conscientiousness 0.25 0.863 0.83 0.475 0.48 0.695 1.23 0.296 0.17 0.914 0.13 0.944 0.15 0.928
Openness 3.64 0.012 3.57 0.014 0.06 0.979 1.97 0.116 1.70 0.164 1.29 0.277 0.43 0.733
Imagination 1.43 0.232 0.84 0.470 0.76 0.516 0.55 0.647
Intellect 13.32 <0.001 5.32 0.001 9.33 <0.001 4.59 0.004

The sample sizes used in these analyses varied between 2,914 and 17,030 for the between-family analyses and between 1,094 and 3,156 for the within-family analyses. See Table S1 for the specific sample sizes.

*

In the NLSY, due to the content of the questionnaire, openness to experience could not be decomposed into imagination and intellect.

In the within-family sample of the SOEP, there were not enough individuals with information on IQ (n = 141) to conduct meaningful analyses, given the small effect sizes that were expected.