Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec;56(12):2297–2308. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M062034

TABLE 1.

Summary of the effects of ω3-PUFA dietary supplementation on cardiac morphology and function following TAC

CO Sham CO TAC FO TAC EPA TAC DHA TAC
RBC FA%
 n 18 20 15 16
 EPA 0.27 ± 0.05 1.54 ± 0.04b 2.71 ± 0.13b 0.46 ± 0.09
 DHA 4.83 ± 0.59 8.47 ± 0.79b 8.09 ± 0.76b 9.73 ± 1.17b
Pathology
 n 5 18 20 16 19
 HW (mg) 107.1 ± 4.2 176.8 ± 8.7a 187.2 ± 8.6 183.4 ± 9.8 177.0 ± 8.6
 BW (g) 24 ± 1 25 ± 0 25 ± 0 25 ± 0 24 ± 0
 HW/BW (mg/g) 4.5 ± 0.2 7.1 ± 0.41a 7.5 ± 0.3 7.5 ± 0.5 7.3 ± 0.4
Echocardiography
 n 5 19 19 15 19
 HR 528 ± 6 517 ± 8 526 ± 4 533 ± 7 522 ± 5
 EF 69.8 ± 4.3 52.4 ± 4.0a 50.0 ± 3.9 48.1 ± 4.3 52.1 ± 4.2
 E/E’ 19.4 ± 1.1 31.4 ± 1.9a 34.2 ± 2.7 29.7 ± 2.1 28.7 ± 2.1
 AoV 1001 ± 153 4736 ± 223a 5000 ± 221 4459 ± 165 4676 ± 155
Histology
 n 5 14 14 10 14
 Fibrosis (%) 1.46 ± 0.25 3.66 ± 0.97a 2.55 ± 0.65 1.44 ± 0.29 3.54 ± 0.86

RBC FA%, erythrocyte FA percent; HR, heart rate; AoV, peak aortic velocity; Fibrosis, percentage of positive picrosirius red stain of ventricular tissue.

a

P < 0.05 versus CO Sham (t-test).

b

P < 0.05 versus CO TAC (one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-test).