Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 23.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2014 May 14;49(11):1457–1464. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.912230

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Plot of the interactions between cued go/no-go and DAST in the prediction of the likelihood of not using a condom. The cued go/no-go is plotted at the mean (medium response disinhibition), the mean plus 1 SD (high response disinhibition), and the mean minus 1 SD (low response disinhibition).