Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Rhythm. 2015 Aug 10;12(12):2402–2410. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.08.009

Table 2.

Association of SAI QRST with CRT response.

Predictor=SAI QRST tertiles Odds Ratio (95%CI) (Tertile 3 vs. Tertiles 1 & 2) P AIC*
Model 1 (unadjusted) 2.18 (1.25, 3.79) 0.011 319.26
Model 2 (adjusted by age, sex) 2.33 (1.32, 4.11) 0.005 315.02
Model 3 (model 2 + by cardiomyopathy type) 2.21 (1.25, 3.93) 0.007 311.17
Model 4 (model 2 + LVEF) 2.23 (1.26, 3.95) 0.006 314.57
Model 5 (model 2 + BBB morphology, QRS) 2.00 (1.10, 3.62) 0.023 307.23
Model 6 (model 2 + renal function) 2.33 (1.32, 4.11) 0.003 316.92
Model 7 (model 2 + sodium) 2.26 (1.28, 4.00) 0.005 312.98
Model 8 (model 2+ LVEF, CM type, QRS, BBB morph, renal function, Na) 1.86 (1.02, 3.41) 0.044 307.01
Model 9 (model 2+ LVEF, CM type, QRS, BBB morph, LV lead position (RAO and LAO)) 1.71 (0.92, 3.17) 0.087 306.44
FINAL MODEL, (model 2+ LVEF, CM type, QRS, BBB morph) 1.87 (1.03, 3.42) 0.041 306.06
*

Smaller AIC indicates better model fit