Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Rhythm. 2015 Aug 10;12(12):2488–2498. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.08.014

TABLE 2.

Electrophysiology Study Findings and Correlation between Electroanatomic Mapping and PET

Patient Epicardial VTs TCL VT
Morphology
EAM Perfusion defect 18-FDG
uptake
EAM/PET Concordance
1 yes 1 430 RBI anteroseptal epi anteroseptal, inferoseptal anteroseptal, inferoseptal
2 yes 4 410,390,370,250 RBS (3), LBI lateral, septal lateral, inferolateral inferior
3 no 0 anterolateral anterior inferolateral, anterolateral
4 yes 5 480,420,410,360,350 RBI (2), RBS (2) lateral septal lateral
5 no 5 490,490,410,370,270 LBI (2), RBI (2), LBS anteroseptal, RV normal anteroseptal
6 yes 3 620,500,420 RB (2), RB lateral, septal normal anterolateral
7 no 2 PVC LBI RVOT epi normal RVOT
8 yes 0 inferoseptal, inferior normal inferior, inferoseptal
9 yes 4 450,420,410,390 RBS (3), LBI inferior normal inferolateral
10 no 0 basal lateral apex, inferolateral, anterolateral anterolateral, inferolateral
11 yes 6 500,380,375,340,330,300 LBS (4), LBI RV free wall, RV septum anteroseptal RV free wall
12 no 0 septum septum septum, basal lateral
13 yes 2 310,280 RBI, LBI anterolateral epi normal lateral, apex, septum
14 yes 0 lateral, RVOT inferior inferolateral, septum
EAM/PET Discordance
15 yes 2 310,210 RB, LB basal lateral normal septum
16 yes 4 280,280,270,255 LBI (2), RBI (2) basal anterolateral normal anteroapical, inferior
17 yes 1 390 RBS basal inferoseptum anterior anteroseptal
18 yes 1 330 LBI RV anterolateral anterolateral
19 yes 1 250 RBI anterolateral anteroseptal, inferior RV