. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 May 23;50:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.05.008

Table 5.

Hierarchical Regression Analyses of Individual Differences in Social Anxiety and (a) Attentional Control – Shifting and (b) Attentional Control – Focusing Predicting Attentional Engagement Bias Scores for Threat Stimuli.

Moderator	(a) ACS-Shifting				(b) ACS-Focusing

	B	SE B	β	ΔR²	B	SE B	β	ΔR²
Step 1				.05				.05
LSAS	−.97	.52	−.22		−.97	.52	−.22
Step 2				.02				.01
LSAS	−.77	.55	−.17		−1.11	.56	−.25
Moderator	3.65	3.47	.13		−2.08	3.19	−.08
Step 3				.03				.001
LSAS	−.43	.59	−.10		−1.16	.59	−.26
Moderator	4.04	3.44	.14		−2.11	3.21	−.08
LSAS × Moderator	.20	.13	.19		−.03	.11	−.04

Note. ACS = Attentional Control Scale; LSAS = Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < 001.

There were no significant main or interaction effects in predicting attentional engagement bias scores for negative stimuli.