Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 24;5:16927. doi: 10.1038/srep16927

Table 3. Comparison of the diagnostic value of TIRADS, BSRTC and BRAFV600E mutation Analysis.

Statistics TIRADS BSRTC BRAFV600Emutation TIRADS + BSRTC BSRTC + BRAFV600Emutation TIRADS + BSRTC + BRAFV600Emutation
Sensitivity (95% CI) 73.1 (64.8–80.4) 77.6 (69.6–84.4) 85.1 (77.9–90.6) 92.5 (86.7–96.4) 97.8 (93.6–99.5) 98.5 (94.7–99.8)
Specificity (95% CI) 88.4 (79.7–94.3) 97.7 (91.9–99.7) 100.0 (95.8–100.0) 86.1 (76.9–92.6) 97.7 (91.9–99.7) 86.1 (76.9–92.6)
PPV (95% CI) 90.7 (83.6–95.5) 98.1 (93.4–99.8) 100.0 (96.8–100.0) 91.2 (85.1–95.4) 98.5 (94.7–99.8) 91.7 (85.9–95.6)
NPV (95% CI) 67.9 (58.3–76.4) 73.7 (64.6–81.5) 81.1 (72.3–88.1) 88.1 (79.1–94.2) 96.6 (90.2–99.3) 97.4 (90.7–99.7)
AUC (95% CI) 0.808 (0.749–0.857) 0.876 (0.826–0.917) 0.925 (0.882–0.956) 0.893 (0.844–0.930) 0.977 (0.948–0.993) 0.923 (0.879–0.954)

Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval.