Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 10;2016:8797316. doi: 10.1155/2016/8797316

Table 2.

Logistic regression analysis of the association between different A1c groups and insulin resistance.

Characteristics Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
A1c groups
 Group 1 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 Group 2 1.30 (0.82–2.05) 0.264 0.95 (0.57–1.57) 0.834 0.91 (0.54–1.53) 0.708
 Group 3 1.29 (0.83–2.00) 0.266 1.03 (0.64–1.68) 0.892 1.01 (0.61–1.68) 0.969
 Group 4 1.89 (1.06–3.37) 0.032 1.66 (0.86–3.21) 0.134 1.55 (0.76–3.17) 0.226
 Group 5 1.85 (1.13–3.02) 0.014 2.16 (1.26–3.69) 0.005 2.04 (1.16–3.61) 0.014
Female 1.79 (1.22–2.63) 0.003 2.30 (1.50–3.51) <0.001
Age (years) 0.98 (0.96–0.99) 0.010 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.882
BMI (kg/m2) 1.13 (1.05–1.21) 0.001 1.11 (1.03–1.19) 0.007
WC (cm) 1.05 (1.02–1.07) <0.001 1.05 (1.02–1.07) 0.001
Systolic BP (mmHg) 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.772
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 0.001
Cholesterol (mmol/L) 0.97 (0.80–1.19) 0.787
Triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.17 (1.02–1.33) 0.021
AST (U/L) 1.01 (0.98–1.04) 0.646
ALT (U/L) 1.02 (0.99–1.05) 0.118

Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, BMI, and WC. Model 3: adjusted for age, gender, BMI, WC, Systolic BP, Diastolic BP, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, AST, and ALT.