Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Educ Psychol. 2015 Apr 20;107(4):1116–1135. doi: 10.1037/edu0000033

Table 2.

Descriptive Statistics by Intervention Condition for Studies 1–3


Study 1: Testing a Communal Utility Value Intervention (intervention is between-subjects)

Research
Value
Intervention
Condition
Beliefs that
biomedical research
had communal
utility value
Beliefs that
biomedical research
had agentic utility
value
Biomedical research
positivity
Future career
motivation

M SD M SD M SD M SD

High
communion
5.56a 0.99 4.46a 1.08 4.88a 1.14 3.41a 1.28
Low
communion
4.12b 0.75 4.27a 1.06 4.29b 0.90 2.82b 0.99

Study 2: Testing Different Types of Communal Utility Value Interventions (intervention is between-subjects)

Research
Value
Intervention
Condition
Beliefs that
biomedical research
had communal
utility value
Beliefs that
biomedical research
had agentic utility
value
Biomedical research
positivity
Future career
motivation
Importance of
biomedical research

M SD M SD M SD M SD M SD

Multiple-
communal
5.98a 1.00 4.48a 1.50 5.50a 1.21 3.57a 1.38 6.12a 0.63
Helping
others
5.36a, b 0.85 4.08a, b 1.09 4.87a, b 1.13 3.32a, b 1.07 5.88a 0.66
Working
with others
4.79b, c 1.24 4.74a, b 1.25 4.04c 1.21 2.70b 1.20 5.25b 0.93
Forming
Connections
with others
4.97b 1.14 4.52a, b 0.92 4.62b, c 1.08 3.64a 1.53 5.27b 0.95
Control 4.19c 1.53 3.95b 1.35 4.46b, c 1.33 2.99a, b 1.40 5.25b 0.98

Study 3: Testing the Addition of Communal and Agentic Utility Value Interventions (intervention is within-subjects)

Research
Value
Intervention
Condition
Beliefs that
biomedical research
had communal
utility value
Beliefs that
biomedical research
had agentic utility
value
Biomedical research
positivity
Future career
motivation
Importance of
biomedical research

M SD M SD M SD M SD M SD

Multiple-
communal
5.04a 1.33 4.29a 1.33 4.21a 1.45 2.88a 1.64 5.60 1.04
Multiple-
agentic
4.05a, b 1.40 4.12a 1.42 3.52b 1.39 2.52b 1.50 4.93a 1.04
Multiple-
communal
and agentic
5.18 1.26 4.47 1.39 4.15a 1.40 2.95a 1.54 5.64 0.91
Control 4.23b 1.37 3.89 1.29 3.48b 1.41 2.51b 1.51 5.11a 1.06

Note. For each study and within each dependent variable, means with different subscripts (or no subscripts) differ from each other, p ≤ .050. For simplicity and clarity, all means and standard deviations are presented for the raw data, not the transformed data.