Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 24;10(11):e0143584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143584

Table 3. Comparison of the means of qualitative (Likert scale) and quantitative (fourier coefficients) image evaluation of NOMAR, DEMAR, IMAR and IMAR+DEMAR at hip prosthesis.

NOMAR = no metal artifact reduction, DEMAR = Dual-energy metal artifact reduction, IMAR = iterative metal artifact reduction, IMAR+DEMAR = combination of IMAR and DEMAR, p = p value, n.s. = non-significant.

NOMAR DEMAR p* IMAR p* IMAR+DEMAR p* p** p***
Qualitative analysis
Artifact 3.84 ± 0.37 3.29 ± 0.71 0.0045 2.18 ± 0.51 <0.0001 1.87 ± 0.40 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0518
Tissue adjacent 3.89 ± 0.32 3.24 ± 0.69 0.0005 2.16 ± 0.62 <0.0001 1.79 ± 0.51 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0559
Tissue distant 3.34 ± 0.94 2.34 ± 0.94 0.0018 1.03 ± 0.59 <0.0001 0.68 ± 0.65 <0.0001 0.0001 0.0709
Quantitative analysis
Streaks 137035 ± 101765 91991 ± 96934 <0.0001 60558 ± 43022 <0.0001 32359 ± 18567 <0.0001 0.0015 <0.0001
(-32.87%) (-55.81%) (-76.39%) (-33.17%) (-46.57%)

* Comparison of the means vs. NOMAR

**Comparison of the means IMAR vs. DEMAR.

*** Comparison of the means IMAR vs. IMAR+DEMAR