Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 24;10(11):e0143584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143584

Table 4. Comparison of the means of qualitative (Likert scale) and quantitative (fourier coefficients) image evaluation of NOMAR, DEMAR, IMAR and IMAR+DEMAR at dental implants.

NOMAR = no metal artifact reduction, DEMAR = Dual-energy metal artifact reduction, IMAR = iterative metal artifact reduction, IMAR+DEMAR = combination of IMAR and DEMAR, p = p value, n.s. = non-significant.

NOMAR DEMAR p* IMAR p* IMAR+DEMAR p* p** p***
Qualitative analysis
Artifact 3.89 ± 0.44 3.66 ± 0.60 0.0309 2.60 ± 0.60 <0.0001 2.33 ± 0.52 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0880
Tissue adjacent 3.89 ± 0.36 3.54 ± 0.78 0.0301 2.73 ± 0.46 <0.0001 2.39 ± 0.57 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0158
Tissue distant 2.87 ± 0.97 2.50 ± 0.96 0.0892 1.42 ± 0.56 <0.0001 0.81 ± 0.63 <0.0001 0.0001 0.0004
Quantitative analysis
Streaks 255720 ± 148377 234076 ± 150932 0.106 73877 ± 37441 <0.0001 60455 ± 29116 <0.0001 0.0014 <0.0001
(-8.46%) (-71.11%) (-76.36%) (-68.44%) (-18.17%)

* Comparison of the means vs. NOMAR

**Comparison of the means IMAR vs. DEMAR.

*** Comparison of the means IMAR vs. IMAR+DEMAR