Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0143327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143327

Table 7. Segmentation results when the present method was evaluated on 23 3D MR images with a leave-one-out experiment.

The results are calculated on 3D volumes.

Dice overlap coefficient on 3D volume (%)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Mean ± STD Median
88.6 86.9 86.7 85.1 88.4 89.2 88.2 87.1 88.3 89.5 89.5 89.9
#13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 88.7 ± 2.9 89.3
86.6 88.5 88.0 87.3 91.8 91.0 87.3 91.2 87.9 91.9 91.7
Average absolute distance on 3D volume (mm)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Mean ± STD Median
1.7 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.4
#13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 1.5 ± 0.2 1.5
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.3
Hausdorff distance on 3D volume (mm)
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Mean ± STD Median
6.5 8.3 8.1 8.3 6.7 6.2 7.3 6.2 5.9 5.1 7.8 5.6
#13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 6.4 ± 1.2 6.2
6.1 5.5 7.0 6.9 6.1 4.6 7.4 5.0 6.6 4.3 4.7