Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 23;4:10.3402/jev.v4.28414. doi: 10.3402/jev.v4.28414

Table II.

Statistical analysis of indicators of efficacy

Comparison p Comparison p
HbS (%) Crisis vs. HU p<0.001 Bilirubin (mmol L−1) Crisis vs. HbAA p<0.01
Crisis vs. TXN p<0.001 Steady state vs. HbAA p<0.001
Crisis vs. HbSC p<0.001 TXN vs. HbAA p<0.01
Steady state vs. HU p<0.01 LDH (IU L−1) Crisis vs. HU p<0.001
Steady state vs. TXN p<0.001 Crisis vs. TXN p<0.05
Steady state vs. HbSc p<0.001 Crisis vs. HbSc p<0.001
HU vs. TXN p<0.001 Crisis vs. HbAA p<0.001
HU vs. HbSC p<0.001 WCC (×109 L−1) Crisis vs. HbAA p<0.001
TXN vs. HbSC p<0.001 Crisis vs. HU p<0.001
Hb (g dl−1) Crisis vs. HbAA p<0.001 Steady state vs. HU p<0.001
Crisis vs. HU p<0.001 HbAA vs. steady state p<0.001
Crisis vs. steady state p<0.01 Neutrophil (×109 L−1) Crisis vs. steady state p<0.05
Crisis vs. TXN p<0.001 Crisis vs. HU p<0.001
Crisis vs. HbSC p<0.001 Crisis vs. HbAA p<0.001
Steady state vs. TXN p<0.001 Reticulocytes (ml−1) Crisis vs. HU p<0.05
Steady state vs. HbSC p<0.001 Crisis vs. HbAA p<0.001
Steady state vs. HbAA p<0.001 Steady state vs. HU p<0.001
HU vs. steady state p<0.001 Steady state vs. HbAA p<0.001
TXN vs. normal p<0.05 TXN vs. HbAA p<0.001
HbF (%) Crisis vs. HU p<0.01
HU vs. steady state p<0.05
HU vs. TXN p<0.001