Table II.
Statistical analysis of indicators of efficacy
Comparison | p | Comparison | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HbS (%) | Crisis vs. HU | p<0.001 | Bilirubin (mmol L−1) | Crisis vs. HbAA | p<0.01 |
Crisis vs. TXN | p<0.001 | Steady state vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | ||
Crisis vs. HbSC | p<0.001 | TXN vs. HbAA | p<0.01 | ||
Steady state vs. HU | p<0.01 | LDH (IU L−1) | Crisis vs. HU | p<0.001 | |
Steady state vs. TXN | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. TXN | p<0.05 | ||
Steady state vs. HbSc | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. HbSc | p<0.001 | ||
HU vs. TXN | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | ||
HU vs. HbSC | p<0.001 | WCC (×109 L−1) | Crisis vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | |
TXN vs. HbSC | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. HU | p<0.001 | ||
Hb (g dl−1) | Crisis vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | Steady state vs. HU | p<0.001 | |
Crisis vs. HU | p<0.001 | HbAA vs. steady state | p<0.001 | ||
Crisis vs. steady state | p<0.01 | Neutrophil (×109 L−1) | Crisis vs. steady state | p<0.05 | |
Crisis vs. TXN | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. HU | p<0.001 | ||
Crisis vs. HbSC | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | ||
Steady state vs. TXN | p<0.001 | Reticulocytes (ml−1) | Crisis vs. HU | p<0.05 | |
Steady state vs. HbSC | p<0.001 | Crisis vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | ||
Steady state vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | Steady state vs. HU | p<0.001 | ||
HU vs. steady state | p<0.001 | Steady state vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | ||
TXN vs. normal | p<0.05 | TXN vs. HbAA | p<0.001 | ||
HbF (%) | Crisis vs. HU | p<0.01 | |||
HU vs. steady state | p<0.05 | ||||
HU vs. TXN | p<0.001 |