. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 25.

Published in final edited form as: J Nucl Med. 2015 Jun 11;56(7):1003–1010. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.154336

TABLE 2.

PET and MR Imaging Detection of Prostate Cancer on 12-Segment Prostatectomy Pathology

Modality	Sensitivity	Specificity	Positive predictive value	Negative predictive value	Accuracy
MR imaging
All positive	0.39 (0.25–0.54), n = 69	0.89 (0.81–0.94), n = 75	0.73 (0.53-–0.87), n = 34	0.58 (0.37–0.77), n = 110	0.65 (0.51–0.76), n = 144
Stringent	0.35 (0.20–0.55), n = 69	0.91 (0.82–0.95), n = 75	0.73 (0.50–0.88), n = 29	0.58 (0.36–0.77), n = 115	0.62 (0.48–0.75), n = 144
¹⁸F-DCFBC PET
All positive	0.17 (0.09–0.29), n = 77	0.96 (0.87–0.99), n = 79	0.81 (0.51–0.95), n = 16	0.53 (0.35–0.70), n = 140	0.57 (0.42–0.71), n = 156
Stringent	0.10 (0.04–0.25), n = 77	1.00 (1.00–1.00), n = 79	1.00 (1.00–1.00), n = 8	0.53 (0.35–0.70), n = 148	0.56 (0.39–0.71), n = 156

Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.