Table 2. Publications in peer-reviewed journals with and without CoI disclosures, four internationally disseminated psychosocial interventions, Jan 2008–July 2014.
| Row 1 | Characteristic | Triple P | NFP | MST | IY | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Included in analysis | 79 | 14 | 25 | 16 | 134 |
| C | COI fully disclosed, editor not contacted | 8 | 8 | 16 | 10 | 42 |
| D | Editor contacted | 71 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 92 |
| D1 | CoI disclosure missing | 60 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 79 |
| D2 | "No conflict of interest" statement | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| D3 | Ambiguous or incomplete disclosure | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| E | No erratum/corrigendum published | 13 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 26 |
| E1 | No disclosure policy | 11 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 |
| E2 | Not program paper–journal/author response | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| E3 | CoI deemed sufficient | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| E4 | Unable/unwilling to examine | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| E5 | No final response | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| F | Erratum/corrigendum announced | 57 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 65 |
| F1 | Journal mishandling | 14 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 16 |
| F2 | Authors submit corrected or new CoI | 43 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 49 |
| Rates | ||||||
| Disclosure rate 2 | 11% | 57% | 73% | 63% | 33% | |
| Errata rate 3 | 80% | 17% | 33% | 67% | 71% |
Notes
1 See S1 Appendix for coding scheme and operational definitions.
2 Calculated as (C+E3)/(B-E2).
3 Calculated as F/D.