Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 11;144(1):123–137. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815000965

Table 4a.

Association between vaginal bacterial community types and hrHPV, Abuja, Nigeria 2012

Model A* Model B Univariate logistic model Model C Multiple logistic regression model
Total sample (N = 278) OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
CST IV-B (low Lactobacillus spp.) Ref. 1·5 (0·8–2·7) 0·20 Ref.
CST I (L. crispatus) 0·6 (0·1–2·0) 0·53 0·7 (0·2–2·2) 0·53 0·4 (0·1–1·7) 0·29
CST III (L. iners) 0·8 (0·4–1·4) 0·42 0·9 (0·5–1·6) 0·69 0·7 (0·3–1·3) 0·22
CST VI (Proteobacteria) 0·2 (0·0–1·7) 0·17 0·3 (0·0–1·9) 0·22
Age, years 0·9 (0·9–1·0) 0·001 0·9 (0·9–1·0) <0·05
Sexual debut age 1·0 (0·9–1·1) 0·73 1·2 (0·6–2·2) 0·28
Number of sexual partners in past year 1·1 (0·6–2·0) 0·64 1·3 (0·7–2·4) 0·43
VIA results (ref. – VIA positive) 0·4 (0·1–1·5) 0·19 0·4 (0·1– 1·7) 0·23
HIV Status (ref. – HIV negative) 4·7 (2·4–9·2) <0·001 5·2 (2·4–11·0) <0·05
Use of male condoms (ref. – Never use) 2·4 (1·3–4·2) 0·003 1·8 (0·9–3·5) 0·10

OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; VIA, visual inspection with acetic acid.

*

Exact logistic regression model.