Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Personal Disord. 2015 May 25;7(1):28–39. doi: 10.1037/per0000127

Table 3.

Correlations among self measures and BPD

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1 Representational Maintenance 1.00
2 Self-Differentiation Total 0.41* 1.00
3 Emotional Reactivity 0.26 0.84** 1.00
4 “I” Position 0.49** 0.78** 0.65* 1.00
5 Emotional Cutoff 0.38* 0.67** 0.35* 0.23 1.00
6 Fusion With Others −0.01 0.71** 0.51** 0.42* 0.37* 1.00
7 Overlap 0.24 0.25 0.30 0.08 0.17 0.21 1.00
8 Number of Aspects −0.16 −0.49** −0.41* −0.33* −0.32* −0.43** 0.16 1.00
9 Evaluative Integration −0.09 −0.29 −0.30 −0.14 −0.17 −0.27 −0.66 −0.10 1.00
10 Proportion of Cards Positive 0.51** 0.65** 0.59** 0.45** 0.60** .22 .35* −0.32* −0.50** 1.00
11 BPD Dimensional Score −0.47** −0.64** −0.55** −0.34* −0.61** −0.35* −0.32* 0.32* 0.37* −0.52** 1.00

n = 38; for all Compartmentalization/Integration correlations, n=34

Representational Maintenance = correlation of ratings of personality traits across a 3 hour period. Self Differentiation Total, Emotional Reactivity, “I” Position, Emotional Cutoff, and Fusion with others = Differentiation of Self Inventory. Number of Aspects, Compartmentalization, Proportion of Cards Positive = Self-Aspects Card Sort Task. BPD dimensional scores from clinician rated IPDE.

High score = high self-differentiation, low emotion reactivity, high “I” position, low emotional cutoff, low fusion with others, high overlap (less complexity), greater # of aspects, more compartmentalization (less integration), greater proportion of cards positive.