Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 May 25;109(6):1132–1149. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000047

Table 4.

Estimated factor correlations between EATQ-R model factors and measures of adolescent functioning
Effortful Control Negative Emotionality Positive Emotionality
C. EC Act.-spec. C. NE Agg.-
spec.		 Dep.- spec. Fear-
spec.		 Frust.-
spec.		 Shy-
spec.		 C. PE Surgency Affil.-
spec.		 Pleasure
sens.-
spec.		 Percep.
sens.-spec.
Depression CDI −.58* .06 .57* .12 .50* −.14 −.07 −.01 −.25 −.15 .31* .00 .23*
Anxiety C. MASC −.38* −.17 .75* −.09 .00 .05 −.18 .16 −.11 −.14 .50* .10 .17
MASC
Physical
Symptom-
Spec.		 −.28* .04 .17* .14 .39* .16 .09 −.08 .06 .07 .10 −.02 .28*
MASC
Separation/
Panic-Spec.		 .07 −.03 .02a −.01a .12a 1.0a .13a .05a .03 −.35* −.31* .09 −.16
MASC Harm
Avoidance-
Spec.		 .38* .39* −.06 −.20 −.26 .42* −.07 .03 .32* .10 −.19 .06 .08
ADHD C. SNAP −.25* .23 −.08 .16 .21 −.01 .19 −.12 −.04 .12 −.09 −.09 .13
SNAP
Inattention-
Spec.		 −.21 −.07 −.02 .05 .19 .10 .14 .08 −.12 −.02 .07 .10 .05
SNAP
Hyperactivity
-Spec.		 .15 .05 −.10 −.12 .14 .08 .07 .10 −.12 .01 −.04 .15 .00
SNAP
Impulsivity-
Spec.		 .14 −.11 −.02 .03 −.03 .19 .10 −.05 −.06 −.06 −.01 −.07 .07
Interpersonal
Funct.		 RPEG
Antisocial		 −.45* −.04 .36* .46* .02 −.13 −.16 −.09 −.12 −.01 .43* −.10 .18
RPEG Victim −.35* .07 .34* .27* .19 −.05 −.12 −.09 −.04 .05 .30* −.02 .32*
School
Funct.		 Grades .36* −.06 −.11 −.35* −.10 −.25* −.04 −.01 .07 −.05 .09 .16 −.03
School
Discipline
Problems b 		−.18* −.03 −.11 .26* .20 .04 .20 −.10 −.08 .11 .04 −.21 .12

Note. n = 562. Spec. = Specific C= Common, Act. = Activation, Agg. = aggression, Dep. = Depressed Mood, Frust. = Frustration, Affil. = Affiliation Pleasure = Pleasure Sens. Sensitivity, Percep. Sens. = Perceptual Sensitivity, Func. = Functioning

a

The EATQ-R Fear-specific factor is perfectly correlated with the MASC Separation/Panic-Specific factor, causing the covariance matrix to be not positive definite when the MASC Separation/Panic-Specific factor is included in the model. The model was therefore re-run without this factor, and correlations between EATQ NE factors and other MASC factors are reported for the model without a MASC Separation/Panic-Specific factor. Correlations were very similar with and without this factor included.

b

Because school discipline problems were positively skewed, the MLR estimator in mplus, which is robust to non-normality, was used. Results were very similar using the standard FIML estimator.

*

p < .0003 (Bonferroni corrected p value for family-wise error rate of .05).