Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 7;89(6):539–558. doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0372-4

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Relative expression of SGR and SGRL determined by qPCR for a Different organs of a wild-type SGR genotype (cv. Birte). Comparisons of expression are shown for testa, cotyledon, stem, leaf, axes, root and flower (main graph), with the much higher relative expression of SGR in pods shown in inset graph, using SGRL root expression as the calibrator. b Embryos (cotyledons with axes) at 10, 20 and 30 days after flowering (DAF) from a wild-type SGR genotype (cv. Birte), displayed on a log10 scale using SGR 10 DAF expression as the calibrator. c Leaves from wild-type SGR plants at three stages of development (VY very young, M mature, O senescing, cv. Cameor), displayed on a log10 scale using SGR VY expression as the calibrator. d Leaves from a mutant sgr genotype (VY very young, M mature, VO senescing, JI 2822), using SGR VY expression as the calibrator. e Relative expression of SGRL at four stages of leaf development in a wild-type SGR (cv. Cameor) or mutant sgr (JI 2822) genotype (VY very young, Y young, M mature, O senescing), using cv. Cameor VY expression as the calibrator