TABLE 1.
NIG
|
EIG
|
Group differencesa | FCG
|
CAUG
|
Group differencesa | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boys (n = 21) | Girls (n = 29) | Boys (n = 50) | Girls (n = 45) | Boys (n = 24) | Girls (n = 24) | Boys (n = 26) | Girls (n = 21) | |||
CU traits | 17.87 (7.96) | 16.90 (7.86) | 24.20 (10.89) | 22.16 (9.15) | EIG boys > NIG girls, NIG boys; EIG girls > NIG girls | 20.38 (9.39) | 22.42 (8.11) | 27.74 (11.14) | 21.86 (10.41) | CAUG boys > CAUG girls, FCG boys |
Above CU cutoff, n (%) | 1 (5) | 1 (3) | 9 (18) | 4 (9) | EIG boys > NIG girls | 1 (4) | 1 (4) | 8 (31) | 3 (14) | CAUG boys > CAUG girls, FCG boys |
Caregiver warmth | 2.68 (0.64) | 2.57 (0.76) | 2.53 (0.57) | 2.53 (0.74) | — | 2.70 (0.64) | 2.89 (0.71) | 2.38 (0.46) | 2.21 (0.66) | FCG girls > CAUG boys, CAUG girls |
Caregiver responsiveness to distress | 2.45 (0.82) | 2.65 (0.68) | 2.54 (0.67) | 2.50 (0.78) | — | 2.72 (0.75) | 2.67 (0.83) | 2.38 (0.75) | 2.31 (0.68) | — |
Note: Data are shown as mean (SD) except where noted. CAUG = care-as-usual group; EIG = ever-institutionalized group; FCG = foster care group; NIG = never-institutionalized group.
Group differences were determined using pairwise comparisons following 4-group categorical coding and least-significant differences post hoc test at p < .05.