Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep-Oct;23(5):954–962. doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0272.2636

Table 2. - Evaluation of knowledge of nurses on child development before and after intervention. João Pessoa, PB, Brazil, 2009.

Questions Successes Intervention P
Before (n=45) After (n=45)
n % n %
Causes why a two months old child does not follow moving objects with his/her eyes Yes 27 60.0 39 86.7 0.009
No 18 40.0 06 13.3
Age at which the child sit without support Yes 38 84.4 30 66.7 0.09
No 07 15.6 15 33.3
Age at which the child hearing is present Yes 32 71.1 34 75.6 0.81
No 13 28.9 11 24.4
Age at which the child develops language Yes 28 62.2 33 73.3 0.37
No 17 37.8 12 26.7
Knowledge about the motor development Yes 10 22.2 25 55.6 0.002
No 35 77.8 20 44.4
General knowledge of child development Yes 22 48.9 33 73.3 0.03
No 23 51.1 12 26.7
Risk factors related to neuropsychomotor deficit Yes 36 80.0 37 82.2 1.00
No 09 20.0 08 17.8
Identification of language delay Yes 30 66.7 34 75.6 0.49
No 15 33.3 11 24.4
Identification of skills expected for the age Yes 29 64.4 32 71.1 0.65
No 16 35.6 13 28.9
Knowledge about primitive reflexes Yes 24 53.3 29 64.4 0.39
No 21 46.7 16 35.6
Identification of the command of the development functions Yes 15 33.3 14 31.1 1.00
No 30 66.7 31 68.9
Perception of child development Yes 25 55.6 29 64.4 0.52
No 20 44.4 16 35.6
General knowledge of motor skills Yes 12 26.7 12 26.7 0.81
No 33 73.3 33 73.3
Average of correct answers (SD) 7.3 (2.3) 8.5 (2.2) 0.001*

* Paired t-test