Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2015 Aug 20;167(5):994–1000.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.07.050

Table 4.

Comparison of infant characteristics at time of ROP study visits

Infant Characteristics ROP study visits
All visits
(n=4238)
Without AE
(n=4173 visits)
With AE
(n=65 visits)
p value*
**(adjusted)
Weight (grams) mean (SD) 2055 (585) 2058 (585) 1855 (557) 0.006 (0.17)
PMA (weeks) mean (SD) 36.3 (2.6) 36.3 (2.6) 35.5 (2.6) 0.02 (0.57)
PNA (weeks) mean (SD) 9.8 (3.3) 9.8 (3.3) 9.2 (3.2) 0.12
BIO exam occurred 1st and imaging occurred 2nd or was deferred n (%) 2738 (66) 2690 (66) 48 (75) 0.10
Enteral nutritional status n (%) 0.15§
  NPO 322 (8) 313 (7.5) 9 (14)
  Partial enteral feeds 675 (16) 666 (16) 9 (14)
  Full enteral feeds 3241 (76) 3194 (77) 47 (72)
Respiratory support status n (%) 0.03^ (0.04)
  Ventilator 508 (12) 492 (12) 16 (25)
  CPAP 975 (23) 955 (23) 20 (31)
  Nasal Cannula ≤2L/min 1398 (33) 1383 (33) 15 (23)
  No Support 1328 (32) 1314 (32) 14 (22)
§

NPO versus all other forms of nutrition support

^

ventilator versus all other forms of respiratory support

*

p value for difference between infants with and without AEs using two-sample t-test for mean and Chi-squared test for proportional difference

**

p value for multivariable logistic regression with weight, PMA, and ventilator support at ROP visit

Abbreviations: PMA, postmenstrual age; PNA, postnatal age; BIO binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy; NPO nils per os; CPAP all forms of nasal, continuous positive airway pressure; NC nasal cannula.

Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding.