Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 27;6:349. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00349

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Extraction of the dynamic components within the averaged EMG records (see detailed description in the text). The same procedure was applied to analyse the reactions in both the flexor (A) and extensor (B) muscles. First, the amplitude of the static component Est was determined by averaging the EMG activities over 2 s periods ΔT1 prior to the end of the hold phases in the test movements. Finally, the time course of the static components in the EMGs was assumed to repeat the time course of the angle changes in the corresponding joint; Equation (5) had been proposed for its description (shown by the gray lines in the second row from top). The dynamic EMG components were determined using the difference between the initial EMG record and the static component evaluation Est. In flexors, the resulting dynamic components Edyn = EEst predominantly include two different waves of activity connected directly with the phases of active muscle shortening (DP) or lengthening (DR). If the Edyn traces are compared with the first derivative of the movement records (dαe/dt), one can conclude that the durations of DP and DR waves exceed the durations of the movement phases. Therefore, for the correct assessment of the areas of the components, the integration times were elongated 1.5 times with respect to the duration of the derivative waves (lines Δt1 and Δt2 in the bottom panels, dαe/dt graphs). The EMG calibration is given in % of MVC.