Table 7.
Ranking of RPHC work in Eastern, Central and Western provinces of China.
| Provinces | D+ | D- | Ci | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern China | ||||
| Shanghai | 0.60 | 1.49 | 0.71 | 1 |
| Zhenjiang | 0.94 | 1.07 | 0.53 | 2 |
| Beijing | 1.23 | 1.33 | 0.52 | 3 |
| Tianjin | 1.20 | 1.23 | 0.51 | 4 |
| Fujian | 1.12 | 1.13 | 0.50 | 5 |
| Shandong | 1.09 | 1.02 | 0.48 | 6 |
| Heilongjiang | 1.13 | 1.03 | 0.48 | 6 |
| Jilin | 1.22 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 8 |
| Jiangsu | 1.19 | 0.89 | 0.43 | 9 |
| Liaoning | 1.20 | 0.82 | 0.40 | 10 |
| Guangdong | 1.29 | 0.69 | 0.35 | 11 |
| Hebei | 1.31 | 0.66 | 0.34 | 12 |
| Hainan | 1.55 | 0.61 | 0.28 | 13 |
| Central China | ||||
| Anhui | 0.46 | 1.31 | 0.74 | 1 |
| Shanxi | 1.05 | 0.95 | 0.47 | 2 |
| Henan | 1.13 | 0.77 | 0.40 | 3 |
| Hunan | 1.10 | 0.74 | 0.40 | 3 |
| Hubei | 1.06 | 0.64 | 0.38 | 5 |
| Jiangxi | 1.26 | 0.41 | 0.24 | 6 |
| Western China | ||||
| Xinjiang | 1.24 | 1.26 | 0.50 | 1 |
| Inner Mongolia | 1.33 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 2 |
| Guangxi | 1.37 | 0.99 | 0.42 | 3 |
| Guizhou | 1.36 | 0.94 | 0.41 | 4 |
| Chongqing | 1.37 | 0.94 | 0.41 | 4 |
| Ningxia | 1.43 | 0.91 | 0.39 | 6 |
| Qinghai | 1.38 | 0.78 | 0.36 | 7 |
| Tibet | 1.48 | 0.68 | 0.32 | 8 |
| Shaanxi | 1.51 | 0.68 | 0.31 | 9 |
| Sichuan | 1.49 | 0.65 | 0.30 | 10 |
| Gansu | 1.51 | 0.60 | 0.28 | 11 |
| Yunnan | 1.55 | 0.59 | 0.27 | 12 |
Notes: D+ is the distance from the indicator group of every Western province to the positive ideal solution; D− is the distance from the indicator group of every Western province to the negative ideal solution; Ci is the relative closeness to the optimal solution and is also the basis of ranking.