Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 12;12(11):14364–14381. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114364

Table 5.

Logistic regression models analysis of socio-demographic characteristics in household safer water consumption.

Characteristics β S.E P OR (95%CI)
Family size 3–4 (Reference)
1–2 −1.899 0.642 0.003 ** 0.150 (0.043, 0.527)
5–6 −0.255 0.360 0.479 0.775 (0.382, 1.571)
≥7 −0.671 0.623 0.282 0.511 (0.151, 1.734)
Self-reported income level Average level (Reference)
Poor or poorer 0.298 0.446 0.503 1.348 (0.562, 3.231)
Better 1.551 0.528 0.003 ** 4.714 (1.674, 13.279)
Household income mainly using for food No (Reference)
Yes 0.711 0.363 0.050 ** 2.036 (1.000, 4.144)
Food supply Household production (Reference)
Half household production half purchasing 0.298 0.446 0.503 1.348 (0.562, 3.231)
Purchasing food at local markets 1.551 0.528 0.003 ** 4.714 (1.674, 13.279)
Participation in new rural cooperative medical treatment No (Reference)
Yes −2.492 1.276 0.051 0.083 (0.007, 1.009)

Safe drinking water choice was defined as using only barreled water, using only tap water, using only both barreled water and tap water for drinking. ** Significant at p < 0.05.