Table 3.
Characteristics | Hair Mercury Level (µg/g) | p Value a | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
≤0.1 (n = 75) | >0.1 and <0.4 (n = 115) | ≥0.4 (n = 62) | |||
Age, months b | 11.0 (10.2, 12.0) | 11.1 (10.3, 12.35) | 11.25 (9.75~12.1) | 0.644 c | |
Male | 42 | 54 | 29 | 0.417 | |
Female | 33 | 61 | 33 | ||
Gestational age, weeks b | 39 (38, 40) | 39 (38, 40) | 39 (38, 40) | 0.241 c | |
<37 weeks, n | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0.194 | |
Study years, n | |||||
2009/2010 | 15 | 55 | 41 | <0.001 | |
2013/2014 | 60 | 60 | 21 | ||
Anthropometry, Z-score d | |||||
Birthweight, kg | 3.23 (3.13, 3.33) | 3.26 (3.19, 3.33) | 3.25 (3.17, 3.34) | 0.878 e | |
birthweight <2.5 kg, n | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0.013 | |
birthweight | −0.17 (−0.39, 0.05) | −0.08 (−0.24, 0.07) | −0.08 (−0.27, 0.10) | 0.743 e | |
weight for age | 0.67 (0.49, 0.88) | 0.49 (0.32, 0.65) | 0.39 (0.17. 0.60) | 0.142 e | |
WAZ-BWZ | 0.86 (0.62, 1.10) | 0.57 (0.39, 0.75) | 0.46 (0.22, 0.70) | 0.045 e | |
height for age | 0.58 (0.32, 0.84) | 0.55 (0.33, 0.77) | 0.51 (0.23, 0.79) | 0.983 e | |
Dominant feeding method, n | |||||
mostly breastfed | 20 | 74 | 50 | <0.001 | |
mixed fed | 11 | 14 | 6 | ||
mostly formula fed | 37 | 24 | 5 | ||
others | 7 | 3 | 1 | ||
Duration of mostly breastfeeding, months b | 0 (0–9) | 10 (3.5–11.35) | 10.25 (6.3–12.0) | <0.001 c | |
Fish intake (presence/absence) | |||||
total (n = 241) | 35/39 | 60/49 | 39/19 | 0.024 | |
2009/2010 (n = 100) | 7/7 | 26/23 | 28/9 | 0.035 | |
2013/2014 (n = 141) | 28/32 | 34/26 | 11/10 | 0.448 | |
Duration of fish intake, months b | |||||
total | 0.0 (0.0, 2.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 2.0) | 1.0 (0.0, 3.25) | 0.033 c | |
2009/2010 | 0.5 (0.0, 3.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 2.0) | 2.0 (0.0, 4.0) | 0.006 c | |
2013/2014 | 0.0 (0.0, 2.0) | 1.0 (0.0, 2.0) | 1.0 (0.0, 2.0) | 0.867 c | |
Iron status, n | |||||
Deficiency | 10 | 44 | 29 | <0.001 | |
No deficiency | 65 | 71 | 33 | ||
Iron deficiency anemia | 4 | 22 | 13 | 0.011 |
a The values were calculated using the chi-square test, unless otherwise stated; b The values are presented as the median and interquartile range; c The values were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test; d The values are presented as the mean and 95% confidence interval; e The values were calculated using the ANOVA.