Table 1.
Procrustes Distances between Morphologies | WT GD after 10 days in Water | Pseudo GD | WT GD | Pseudo DJ | WT DJ | Pseudo PF | WT PF | Pseudo SM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT GD | 0.10 | 0.10 | ||||||
Pseudo DJ | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.19 | |||||
WT DJ | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.14 | ||||
Pseudo PF | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.27 | 0.33 | |||
WT PF | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.09 | ||
Pseudo SM | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.26 | |
WT SM | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.22 |
Comparison of average Procrustes distances between wild-type, and experimentally-derived altered morphologies. Comparisons of particular interest are shown in boldface. Procrustes distances are larger between wild-type G. dorotocephala morphologies and the altered species-specific morphologies produced by 8-OH treatment, than between fragments that regenerated G. dorotocephala-resembling heads. In addition, Procrustes distances between 8-OH treated regenerates with altered morphologies, and the species that they resemble, are smaller than distances between regenerates and WT G. dorotocephala morphologies. Procrustes ANOVA of centroid size p < 0.0001. GD = G. dorotocephala; DJ = D. japonica; PF = P. feline; SM = S. mediterranea.