Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 31;34(4):472–481. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.4.472

Table 2. Proximate composition and pH of emulsified pork sausage substituted nitrite with red beet.

Traits Treatments1) ANOVA2) t-test3)

C0 CN RB1 RB2 RN1 RN2 N RB N×RB N RB
Moisture (%) 67.24 67.01 68.00 68.71 68.80 69.21 ns4) *** ns ns **
(0.07) (0.13) (0.04) (0.08) (0.04) (0.04)
Crude fat (%) 13.77 13.84 12.28 12.13 11.88 11.63 ns *** ns ns ns
(0.54) (0.51) (0.11) (0.43) (0.25) (0.62)
Crude ash (%) 1.55 1.48 1.70 1.64 1.68 1.68 ns * ns ns ns
(0.12) (0.13) (0.16) (0.07) (0.03) (0.18)
Crude protein (%) 17.45 17.26 17.58 17.51 17.45 17.13 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.09) (0.14) (0.30) (0.18) (0.16) (0.16)
PH 6.03 6.06 6.21 6.30 6.23 6.22 ns *** ns ns **
(0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.02)

Data are means (SE).

1)Treatments: C0, no added; CN, 75 ppm NaNO2; RB1, 0.5% red beet; RB2, 1.0% red beet; RN1, 75 ppm NaNO2 + 0.5% red beet; RN2, 75 ppm NaNO2 + 1.0% red beet.

2)ANOVA, two-way ANOVA analysis among the treatments; N, nitrite; RB, red beet.

3)t-test: N, t-test analysis between nitrite treatments (RN1 and RN2) and the others (RB1 and RB2) except for control (C0 and CN); RB, ttest analysis between 0.5% red beet treatments (RB1 and RN2) and 1.0% red beet treatments (RB2 and RN2); ns, not significant.

4)ns, not significant; *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.0001.