Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 31;34(4):472–481. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.4.472

Table 5. Texture property of emulsified pork sausage substituted nitrite with red beet during cold storage at 4℃ for 20 d.

Storage time (d) Treatments1) ANOVA2) t-test3)

C0 CN RB1 RB2 RN1 RN2 N RB N×RB N RB
Hardness (N)
0 29.40 30.38 31.36 33.32 31.36 32.34 ns4) ns ns ns ns
(0.98) (1.96) (2.88) (1.96) (1.96) (2.94)
5 32.34 31.36 33.32 35.28 30.38 33.32 ns ns ns ns ns
(3.92) (1.96) (2.90) (2.94) (2.94) (1.96)
10 34.30 31.36 31.36 29.40 33.32 34.30 ns ns ns ns ns
(1.96) (1.96) (2.94) (3.92) (3.92) (3.92)
15 29.40 30.38 28.42 33.32 32.34 30.38 ns ns ns ns ns
(1.96) (1.96) (0.98) (2.94) (2.90) (0.98)
20 30.38 30.38 28.42 28.42 33.32 29.40 ns ns ns ns ns
(2.94) (2.86) (3.92) (2.80) (2.90) (2.94)
Storage effect ns ns ns ns ns ns
Cohesiveness
0 0.58 0.60 0.56 0.59 0.60 0.53 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.02) (0.05) (0.07) (0.04) (0.05) (0.02)
5 0.59 0.58 0.57 0.57 0.58 0.59 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.01) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02)
10 0.55 0.57 0.59 0.55 0.55 0.54 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.01) (0.04) (0.03) (0.04) (0.05) (0.01)
15 0.57 0.60 0.61 0.59 0.53 0.53 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.01) (0.04) (0.05) (0.03) (0.01) (0.07)
20 0.57 0.60 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.54 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.06) (0.03) (0.03) (0.07) (0.02) (0.05)
Storage effect ns ns ns ns ns ns
Springiness (mm)
0 9.90 10.19 10.00 10.19 10.49 9.80 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.10) (0.49) (0.20) (0.20) (0.59) (0.10)
5 10.39 10.09 10.29 10.09 10.09 10.09 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.39) (0.59) (0.20) (0.29) (0.49) (0.29)
10 9.80 10.09 10.00 9.90 10.09 10.09 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.00) (0.20) (0.29) (0.10) (0.39) (0.39)
15 10.00 10.00 10.39 10.00 9.80 10.19 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.29) (0.29) (0.49) (0.20) (0.10) (0.49)
20 10.09 10.19 9.80 10.39 9.80 10.09 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.49) (0.78) (0.00) (0.39) (0.00) (0.49)
Storage effect ns ns ns ns ns ns
Gumminess (N)
0 10.01 10.02 10.00 10.01 10.03 10.00 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.20) (0.20) (0.39) (0.20) (0.29) (0.10)
5 10.02 10.01 10.02 10.01 10.00 10.01 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.10) (0.10) (0.10) (0.29) (0.10) (0.20)
10 10.01 10.02 10.01 10.00 10.01 10.01 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.29) (0.10) (0.10) (0.20) (0.39) (0.39)
15 10.01 10.02 10.00 10.03 10.00 9.98 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.20) (0.10) (0.49) (0.20) (0.20) (0.10)
20 10.02 10.00 10.01 10.01 10.01 9.99 ns ns ns ns ns
(0.20) (0.29) (0.10) (0.29) (0.00) (0.20)
Storage effect ns ns ns ns ns ns

Data are means (SE).

1)Treatments: C0, no added; CN, 75 ppm NaNO2; RB1, 0.5% red beet; RB2, 1.0% red beet; RN1, 75 ppm NaNO2 + 0.5% red beet; RN2, 75 ppm NaNO2 + 1.0% red beet.

2)ANOVA, two-way ANOVA analysis among the treatments; N, nitrite; RB, red beet.

3)t-test: N, t-test analysis between nitrite treatments (RN1 and RN2) and the others (RB1 and RB2) except for control (C0 and CN); RB, ttest analysis between 0.5% red beet treatments (RB1 and RN2) and 1.0% red beet treatments (RB2 and RN2); ns, not significant.

4)ns, not significant.