Table 2. Cooking loss, water holding capacity and moisture contents of pork in ham with various freezing and thawing methods.
| (Unit: %) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments | Refrigeration1) | RT2) | Cold water3) | Microwave4) | ||||
| EM5) | AB6) | EM | AB | EM | AB | EM | AB | |
| Cooking loss | 32.9±1.3c | 23.1±1.0d | 36.5±0.7ab | 35.9±1.3ab | 37.2±0.7a | 33.7±0.6bc | 37.4±0.1a | 34.8±2.4abc |
| WHC7) | 59.9±1.9c | 57.3±0.8b | 59.3±0.8ab | 58.8±0.1ab | 59.3±0.8ab | 58.3±0.8ab | 59.8±0.3a | 59.4±0.5ab |
| Moisture contents | 54.8±3.2b | 54.6±1.4b | 61.3±0.8a | 60.4±0.8a | 61.1±1.0a | 59.9±1.0a | 62.0±0.8a | 63.1±1.0a |
1)Refrigeration: 4±1℃
2)RT (Room temperature): 25℃
3)Cold water: 15℃ tap water
4)Microwave: Thawing method using microwave oven
5)EM: Electro-magnetic freezing (−55℃)
6)AB: Air blast freezing (−45℃)
7)Appearance, flavor, texture, taste and overall acceptability (1=very poor, 9=very good)
a-dMeans within row different superscripts are significantly differences by freezing and thawing methods (p<0.05).