Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 31;34(5):597–603. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.5.597

Table 2. Cooking loss, water holding capacity and moisture contents of pork in ham with various freezing and thawing methods.

(Unit: %)
Treatments Refrigeration1) RT2) Cold water3) Microwave4)

EM5) AB6) EM AB EM AB EM AB
Cooking loss 32.9±1.3c 23.1±1.0d 36.5±0.7ab 35.9±1.3ab 37.2±0.7a 33.7±0.6bc 37.4±0.1a 34.8±2.4abc
WHC7) 59.9±1.9c 57.3±0.8b 59.3±0.8ab 58.8±0.1ab 59.3±0.8ab 58.3±0.8ab 59.8±0.3a 59.4±0.5ab
Moisture contents 54.8±3.2b 54.6±1.4b 61.3±0.8a 60.4±0.8a 61.1±1.0a 59.9±1.0a 62.0±0.8a 63.1±1.0a

1)Refrigeration: 4±1℃

2)RT (Room temperature): 25℃

3)Cold water: 15℃ tap water

4)Microwave: Thawing method using microwave oven

5)EM: Electro-magnetic freezing (−55℃)

6)AB: Air blast freezing (−45℃)

7)Appearance, flavor, texture, taste and overall acceptability (1=very poor, 9=very good)

a-dMeans within row different superscripts are significantly differences by freezing and thawing methods (p<0.05).