Table 3.
Efficacy end point | SAXA + DAPA + MET n = 179 |
SAXA + MET n = 176 |
DAPA + MET n = 179 |
---|---|---|---|
HbA1c (%) | |||
Baseline (mean ± SD) | 8.93 ± 1.19 | 9.03 ± 1.05 | 8.87 ± 1.17 |
Mean change from baseline | −1.47 (−1.62, −1.31) | −0.88 (−1.03, −0.72) | −1.20 (−1.35, −1.04) |
Difference vs saxagliptin + metformin |
−0.59 (−0.81, −0.37) P < 0.0001 |
||
Difference vs dapagliflozin + metformin |
−0.27 (−0.48, −0.05) P = 0.0166 |
||
PPG (mg/dL) | |||
Baseline (mean ± SD) | 243 ± 55.5 | 256 ± 64.3 | 247 ± 56.3 |
Mean change from baseline | −80 (−86.3, −72.8) | −36 (−42.5, −28.7) | −70 (−77.4, −63.5) |
Difference vs saxagliptin + metformin |
−44 (−53.7, −34.3) P<0.0001 |
||
Difference vs dapagliflozin + metformin |
−9 (−18.8, 0.5) P=0.06 |
||
FPG (mg/dL) | |||
Baseline (mean ± SD) | 181 ± 45.5 | 192 ± 45.4 | 185 ± 47.6 |
Mean change from baseline | −38 (−43.2, −32.3) | −14 (−19.6, −8.4) | −32 (−37.3, −26.2) |
Difference vs saxagliptin + metformin |
−24 (−31.6, −15.9) NT |
||
Difference vs dapagliflozin + metformin |
−6 (−13.8, 1.7) NT |
||
Patients with HbA1c <7% | |||
x/n a | 74/177 | 29/175 | 40/173 |
% | 41 (34.5, 48.2) | 18 (13.0, 23.5) | 22 (16.1, 28.3) |
Difference vs saxagliptin + metformin |
23 (14.7, 31.5) NT |
||
Difference vs dapagliflozin + metformin |
19 (10.1, 28.1) NT |
||
Body weight (kg) | |||
Baseline (mean ± SD) | 87.1 ± 18.0 | 88.0 ± 18.7 | 86.3 ± 18.6 |
Mean change from baseline | −2.1 (−2.5, −1.6) | 0 (−0.5, 0.5) | −2.4 (−2.9, −1.9) |
Difference vs saxagliptin + metformin |
−2.1 (−2.7, −1.4) NT |
Data are from NCT01606007 [30]. Values are mean (95% CI) unless otherwise indicated
Adapted with permission from Rosenstock et al. [30]
DAPA dapagliflozin, HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, FPG fasting plasma glucose, MET metformin, NT not tested under sequential testing procedure if previous tested end point was not statistically significant, PPG 2-h postprandial glucose, SAXA saxagliptin
aNumber of responders/number of patients with baseline and week 24 values