Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 11;9(2):137–147.

Table 1.

Infection rates (%) of Iranian Tick Species with CCHF Virus in Different Localities of Iran

Tick species
Province T/P D. marginatus H. anatolicum H. asiaticum H. detritum H. dromedarii H. marginatum H. schulzei H. sp Ha. inermis Ha. punctata O. lahorensis R. bursa R. sanguineus
Ardebil* 130/35 - - - - 0.8 0.8 4.6 6.9 13.8
Azarbayjan-e Sharqi** 56/15 7 - 3.7 5.4 - 11 -
Golestan 130/7 2.3 - - 1.6 0.7 - 0.7
Hamadan*** 88/10 1.2 - 2.3 3.4 1.2 - 1.2 2.3
Ilam 74/3 1.35 1.35 - 1.35
Khorasan-e Joonobi 115/7 - 1.8 1.8 - - 0.9 - - 0.9 0.9
Khorasan-e Shomali 67/5 - 4.5 - 3
MazandaranI 58/1 1.7
MazandaranII 42/4 - - 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4
Qom 14/1 - - 7.1 -
Sistan-o Baluchistan**** 140/6 - - - 8.3 -
Tehran 50/2 - 2,E - - - - 2
Yazd***** 140/8 - 0.7 0.7 1.4 2.1 0.7 -
Total 1112/108 7 11.85 9.55 1.4 23.9 14.95 0.8 17.1 10.7 3.6 17.9 18.3 38

References related to other studies including papers authored/co-authored by senior author (ZT) including;

D: Dermacentor, Ha. Haemaphysalis, H: Hyalomma, R: Rhipicephalus, O: Ornithodoros

•:

Numbers arranged according to collection sites in the map (Fig. 2)

T/P: total tested/positive tick specimen, I. Pushtekooh district, II. Ghaemshahr county, E: egg mass, Blank places: not done, -: negative