Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Jul 29;115(12):1996–2002. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.06.010

Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs for frequency of total sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs)a consumption and type of SSBs consumed during the past month among US adults, based on data from the National Health Interview Survey, 2010b

Region of residence Total SSB ≥1 time/d Type of SSB
Regular sugar-sweetened carbonated beverage ≥1 time/d Fruit drink ≥1 time/d Sports and energy drink ≥1 time/d Sweetened coffee/tea drink ≥1 time/d
←———aOR (95% CI) ———→
Northeast 1.13 (1.01–1.26)c 0.51 (0.45–0.57)c 1.01 (0.84–1.22) 0.91 (0.74–1.11) 1.60 (1.43–1.78)c
Midwest 0.70 (0.64–0.78)c 0.86 (0.78–0.96)c 0.84 (0.71–1.00) 0.85 (0.72–1.02) 0.70 (0.62–0.78)c
South Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
West 0.78 (0.71–0.87)c 0.56 (0.51–0.62)c 0.95 (0.79–1.14) 0.77 (0.64–0.93)c 0.93 (0.84–1.02)
a

Total SSB includes regular sugar-sweetened carbonated beverages, fruit drinks, sports/energy drinks, and sweetened coffee/tea drinks.

b

The multivariable logistic regression model for each SSB included 25,299 adults and controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, and annual household income. The reference group was <1 time/day.

c

Significant findings based on the 95% CI (ie, the CI does not include 1).