Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 12;7(11):9369–9382. doi: 10.3390/nu7115472

Table 4.

Odds ratios (and 95% CIs) for risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) according to the tertiles of dietary pattern score derived from reduced rank regression (n = 249).

Tertile 1 Tertile 2 Tertile 3 p Trend
“High Refined Grains, Fats, Oils and Fruit Juice” Pattern
GDM/pregnancies 8/83 11/83 15/83
Model 1 1.0 1.1 (0.3–3.9) 3.7 (0.9–15.7) 0.09
Model 2 1.0 1.7 (0.5–5.8) 5.1 (1.1–24.0) * 0.04
Model 3 1.0 1.3 (0.5–3.7) 4.9 (1.4–17.3) * 0.009
Model 4 1.0 1.4 (0.4–4.5) 4.9 (1.4–17.0) * 0.007
“High Nuts, Seeds, Fat and Soybean; Low Milk and Cheese” Pattern
GDM/pregnancies 9/83 11/83 14/83
Model 1 1.0 4.7 (1.9–11.5) * 5.2 (2.2–12.2) * 0.004
Model 2 1.0 4.2 (1.6–11.1) * 5.7 (2.1–15.2) * 0.001
Model 3 1.0 5.5 (2.5–12.1) * 8.2 (1.8–37.4) * 0.01
Model 4 1.0 5.3 (2.3–12.2) * 7.5 (1.8–32.3) * 0.009
“High Added Sugar and Organ Meats; Low Fruits, Vegetables and Seafood” Pattern
GDM/pregnancies 5/83 8/83 21/83
Model 1 1.0 1.7 (0.4–7.0) 15.4 (4.5–52.0) * 0.0004
Model 2 1.0 2.2 (0.3–14.1) 20.0 (4.2–95.9) * 0.0004
Model 3 1.0 2.9 (0.6–13.1) 21.1 (4.0–109.8) * <0.0001
Model 4 1.0 3.2 (0.7–15.7) 22.3 (3.9–127.4) * <0.0001

Model 1: Crude association between dietary patterns and gestational diabetes mellitus; Model 2: Adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, family poverty income ratio, education level, and marital status. Model 3: Adjusted for model 2 + energy intake, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), and gestational weight gain. Model 4: Adjusted for model 3 + log-transformed C-reactive protein (CRP); * p < 0.05.