. 2015 Nov 30;10(11):e0143548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143548

Table 9. The best and the worst double heterozygotes in the two loci combinations consistently showing significant DD interaction for bolls/plant in F_{2: 3} population.

Locus 1^a	Locus 2^a	Var%	Genotype^b	Over midparent^c	Over GX1135^d	Best genotype^f	Worst genotype^g
BNL3447(5)	GH137(16)	5.53	12/12	-0.73*	-0.34	22/11	12/11
C2_115(12)	DC40250(21)	6.69	12/12	1.54**	0.90*	11/12	22/22
CER165(13)	NAU3839(14)	4.99	12/12	0.54	0.32	11/22	22/22
CGR115(12)	DC40250(21)	6.69	12/12	1.54**	0.90*	11/12	22/22
CGR6864(25)	GH631(12)	4.65	12/12	2.40**	1.97**	11/12	22/22
DPL551(24)	DPL687(13)	5.67	12/12	-0.32	-1.26**	22/12	22/11
BNL3261(12)	CGR6695(2)	4.46	12/12	-0.70*	0.48	22/22	12/22

See footnotes of Table 7 for explanations

Table 9. The best and the worst double heterozygotes in the two loci combinations consistently showing significant DD interaction for bolls/plant in F2: 3 population.