Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov;77(4):595–607.

Table 1.

Antenatal care (ANC) utilization according to selected characteristics in Afghanistan, 2012 (n=5,658)

ANC utilization
Characteristics Yes No Total
Number (%) Number (%) Number (%)
Residence
Urban 326 (77.4) 95 (22.6) 421 (100)
Rural 2,730 (52.1) 2,507 (47.9) 5,237 (100)
Age
< 20 235 (59.9) 157 (40.1) 392 (100)
20–34 2,230 (54.2) 1,884 (45.8) 4,114 (100)
35–49 591 (51.3) 561 (48.7) 1,152 (100)
Education
No education 2,665 (52.3) 2,429 (47.7) 5,094 (100)
Primary 188 (71.5) 75 (28.5) 263 (100)
Secondary+ 190 (71.4) 76 (28.6) 266 (100)
Parity
1 519 (58.1) 374 (41.9) 893 (100)
2–4 1,287 (53.1) 1,136 (46.9) 2,423 (100)
≥ 5 1,250 (53.4) 1,092 (46.6) 2,342 (100)
Knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy
No 943 (36.2) 1,663 (63.8) 2,606 (100)
Yes 2,108 (69.3) 933 (30.7) 3,041 (100)
Media exposure
No exposure 1,483 (48.4) 1,579 (51.6) 3,062 (100)
Radio 562 (50.2) 557 (49.8) 1,119 (100)
TV 373 (64.5) 205 (35.5) 578 (100)
TV and radio 628 (71.1) 255 (28.9) 883 (100)
Wealth
Poor 1,734 (49.5) 1,770 (50.5) 3,504 (100)
Middle 544 (55.7) 433 (44.3) 977 (100)
Rich 778 (66.1) 399 (33.9) 1,177 (100)
All subjects 3,056 (54.0) 2,602 (46.0) 5,658 (100)

Missing data were 35 for education, 11 for knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy and 16 for media exposure.