Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov;77(4):595–607.

Table 3.

Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of antenatal care utilization in Afghanistan 2012 (n=5,658)

Variables Unadjusted Adjusteda
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Residence
Rural 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Urban 3.15 (2.49–3.99) <0.001 2.74 (2.08–3.60) <0.001
Age
< 20 years 1.42 (1.13–1.79) 0.003 1.18 (0.88–1.60) 0.268
20–34 years 1.12 (0.99–1.28) 0.081 1.13 (0.96–1.33) 0.148
35–49 years 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Education
No education 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Primary 2.29 (1.74–3.00) <0.001 1.69 (1.26–2.27) <0.001
Secondary+ 2.28 (1.74–2.99) <0.001 1.54 (1.14–2.08) 0.005
Parity
1 1.21 (1.04–1.42) 0.015 1.11 (0.91–1.36) 0.306
2–4 0.99 (0.88–1.11) 0.859 0.93 (0.80–1.07) 0.292
5 or more 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy
No 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Yes 3.99 (3.57–4.46) <0.001 3.94 (3.51–4.42) <0.001
Media exposure
No exposure 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Radio 1.07 (0.94–1.23) 0.305 0.89 (0.76–1.03) 0.111
TV 1.94 (1.61–2.33) <0.001 1.34 (1.08–1.66) 0.007
TV and radio 2.62 (2.23–3.08) <0.001 1.78 (1.47–2.15) <0.001
Wealth
Poor 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Middle 1.28 (1.11–1.48) 0.001 1.13 (0.96–1.32) 0.152
Rich 1.99 (1.73–2.28) <0.001 1.08 (0.91–1.29) 0.384

a Adjusted for age, residence, education, parity, knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy, media exposure and wealth.