Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;9:328. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00328

Table 1.

Summary of the animals' characteristics, response rate, and Δ scores.

Group Monkey Years of age Years of shared housing Intimacy index I Response rate (per min) Mean Δ (% gain)
Alone Audience Coaction Social Audience Coaction Social
Δ p Δ p Δ p
Dyad 1 9 0 0 1.9 2.6 3 2.8 37 0.003 57 0.000 46 0.000
11 0 0 2 3.2 3 3.1 60 0.000 52 0.004 57 0.000
Dyad 2 8 3 0.4 0.5 0.9 1.7 1.2 76 0.040 237 0.019 144 0.002
11 3 0.3 0.4 1 1.5 1.2 144 0.010 283 0.030 200 0.001
Triad ♀1 4 4 1 1.7 3.9 3.7 3.8 191 0.000 175 0.000 123 0.000
♀2 4 4 1 1.1 4.2 4.3 4.2 256 0.000 269 0.000 282 0.000
♀3 4 4 1 0.7 3.1 2 2.6 524 0.000 298 0.001 305 0.000
Average 7 3 0.5 1.2 2.7 2.8 2.7 184 196 165
sem 1 1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 64 40 39

Social, scores for audience and coaction taken together; Mean Δ, percent change in response rate relative to the animal's average performance during alone sessions; p-values, significant facilitation revealed by one-sample t-tests relative to zero. Within each group, the animals are listed in hierarchical order, the top-ranking animal appearing first. To the best of our knowledge, there was no genetic link between the members of each group.