Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;5:17090. doi: 10.1038/srep17090

Table 3. Toxicity to bifenazate of T. urticae populations collected in 2013.

Population Date N % Mortalitya LC50 (mg a.i./L) 95% CI Slope ± SEM RRb X2 df
Granger 1 30 Aug 157 82 47.86 11.39 –138.08 1.72 ± 0.22 58.37 3.07 2
*Granger 2c 16 Jul 120 100 3.93 0.34–7.11 1.89 ± 0.64 4.79 0.02 1
*Granger 3 20 Aug 197 76 78.97 55.99 –107.50 1.71 ± 0.19 96.30 2.49 3
*Granger 5 25 Jul 160 93 4.88 0.89–10.76 0.99 ± 0.21 5.95 1.87 2
*Mabton 1 27 Jun 60 96
*Mabton 2 27 Jun 60 96
*Moxee 1 18 Jul 160 90 18.88 9.71–30.14 1.38 ± 0.22 23.02 1.95 2
*Prosser 1 14 Jul 60 100
*Prosser 2 28 Jul 160 85 1.44 ± 0.21 3.23 2
Prosser 3 29 Jul 160 88 25.49 3.87–66.98 1.50 ± 0.21 31.09 2.51 2
*Prosser 4 08 Sep 160 90 6.87 1.36–13.66 1.58 ± 0.42 8.38 0.72 2
*Prosser 5 24 Jul 157 95 9.31 3.91–15.69 1.29 ± 0.29 11.35 0.95 2

a% Mortality stands for the % mortality at ¼ the field rate of bifenazate, which is 224 mg a.i./L.

bRR represents Resistance Ratio = LC50 of field population/ LC50 of the susceptible population.

cOrganic hopyard.

*Molecular data shown in Table 4. -No data available.