Table A3:
No. of Studies (Design) | Risk of Bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication Bias | Upgrade Considerations | Quality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glycemic control (non-uremic patients) | |||||||
Graft loss/insulin independence 15 (observational): 3 comparative 12 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | Large magnitude of effect (+2) | ⊕⊕⊕⊕ Highc |
HbA1c 15 (observational): 4 comparative 11 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕⊕ Low |
Insulin requirements 11 (observational): 3 comparative 8 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕⊕ Low |
C-peptide 11 (observational): 2 comparative 9 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕⊕ Low |
Hypoglycemia 9 (observational): 9 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕⊕ Low |
Glycemic control (uremic patients) | |||||||
Graft loss/insulin independence 7 (observational): 4 comparative 3 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | Large magnitude of effect (+2) | ⊕⊕⊕⊕ Highc |
HbA1c 8 (observational): 4 comparative 4 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | Serious limitations (−1)d | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕ Very Low |
Insulin requirements 8 (observational): 4 comparative 4 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕⊕ Low |
C-peptide 7 (observational): 4 comparative 3 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕⊕ Low |
Hypoglycemia 2 (observational): 1 comparative 1 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕⊕ Low |
Secondary complications of diabetes (non-uremic patients) | |||||||
Cardiovascular disease 4 (observational): 3 comparative 1 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | Serious limitations (−1)d | Serious limitations (−1)e | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕ Very Low |
Retinopathy 5 (observational): 3 comparative 2 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕⊕ Low |
Nephropathy 6 (observational): 3 comparative 3 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | Serious limitations (−1)d | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕ Very Low |
Neuropathy 5 (observational): 3 comparative 2 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | Serious limitations (−1)d | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕ Very Low |
Secondary complications of diabetes (uremic patients) | |||||||
Cardiovascular risk factors 6 (observational): 4 comparative 2 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)e | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕⊕ Low |
Nephropathy 6 (observational): 4 comparative 2 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕⊕ Low |
Health-related quality of life (non-uremic patients) | |||||||
12 (observational): 2 comparative 10 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | Serious limitations (−1)a | Serious limitations (−1)f | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕ Very Low |
Health-related quality of life (uremic patients) | |||||||
2 (observational): 2 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | Serious limitations (−1)a | Serious limitations (−1)f | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕ Very Low |
Adverse events (non-uremic patients) | |||||||
21 (observational): 2 comparative 19 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕⊕ Low |
Adverse events (uremic patients) | |||||||
5 (observational): 1 comparative 4 noncomparative |
Serious limitations (−1)a | Serious limitations (−1)a | No serious limitations | Serious limitations (−1)b | Undetected | None | ⊕⊕ Low |
Abbreviations: GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin.
Most studies were of low quality owing to their study design. Noncomparative studies introduce bias and possible confounding. Follow-up period was usually less than 3 years, with few studies assessing outcomes of interest in the long term. Observational studies start at low quality according to GRADE.
Most studies had small sample sizes (included < 50 patients total).
Evidence upgraded because of large magnitude of effect when compared with insulin. Insulin independence is not possible for patients who are on intensive insulin therapy.
Inconsistencies in results.
Studies included surrogate outcomes for cardiovascular disease.
Studies included both generic and disease-specific scales. Scales are not sensitive to transplantation-specific outcomes.