Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 30;89(24):12341–12348. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01681-15

TABLE 1.

Modal root state and posterior probability estimates resulting from different discrete Bayesian phylogeographic analyses applied to different data sets

Sequencet Method Estimate for data seta:
Complete Rand10A Rand10B Rand10C Rand20A Rand20B Rand20C
pol Symmetric-BSSVS FLP (1.00) SPL (0.99) CTB (0.99) RJN (0.99) POA (0.99) RIG (0.99) RIG (0.99)
Symmetric FLP (0.99) CRI (0.99) FLP (0.97) CRI (0.97) FLP (0.99) FLP (0.98) ITA (0.99)
Asymmetric-BSSVS FLP (1.00) CRI (1.00) FLP (0.99) CTB (0.99) ITA (1.00) FLP (0.99) POA (0.99)
Asymmetric FLP (0.99) RJN (0.99) FLP (0.99) CTB (0.99) ITA (1.00) FLP (0.99) FLP (0.99)
env Symmetric-BSSVS FLP (0.97) FLP (0.99) POA (0.99) POA (0.99) FLP (0.99) FLP (0.99) CXS (0.99)
Symmetric FLP (0.97) FLP (0.99) POA (0.99) FLP (0.96) FLP (0.99) FLP (0.99) CRI (0.99)
Asymmetric-BSSVS FLP (0.99) CRI (0.99) POA (0.99) LAJ (0.99) CRI (1.00) POA (0.99) FLP (1.00)
Asymmetric FLP (0.99) BLU (0.99) FLP (0.99) CRI (0.69) FLP (0.99) CRA (0.99) FLP (1.00)
a

Cities: BLU, Blumenau; CRI, Criciúma; CTB, Curitiba; CXS, Caxias do Sul; FLP, Florianópolis; ITA, Itajaí; LAJ, Lajeado; POA, Porto Alegre; RIG, Rio Grande; RJN, Rio de Janeiro.