Table 2.
Intervention vs. control (control group as reference) | Beta-coefficient (95 % CI) | p-value | Number |
---|---|---|---|
Change in leisure time physical activity (−4;+4) | −0.09 (−0.21; 0.03) | 0.124a | 1470 |
Change in long term school cycling (−2;+2) | −0.02 (−0.10; 0.05) | 0.485a | 1469 |
Change in cycling last week beyond school cycling (−3;+3) | −0.04 (−0.14; 0.05) | 0.355a | 1469 |
Change in school cycling trips last week (−10;+10) | 0.15 (−0.25;0.54) | 0.463 | 1461 |
Change in cardiorespiratory fitness (mL O2∙kg−1∙min−1) | −1.45 (−1.92;-1.00) | <0.001 | 1335 |
Change in BMI (kg∙m−2) | 0.01 (−0.13; 0.15) | 0.887 | 1390 |
Odds ratio of developing overweight or obesityb | 0.88 (0.50; 1.57) | 0.675 | 1512 |
Beta-coefficients are from multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and baseline value. All delta variables are defined so that positive values reflect increases and vice versa. aThe categorical variables are treated as continuous. bOdds ratio is from multiple logistic regression analyses with prevalence of combined overweight and obesity at endline as the outcome adjusted for baseline BMI, age and gender (note that the control group is the reference and that this analysis included only those subjects who were lean at baseline). Study conducted at three different locations in Denmark, 2010–2011