Table 2.
Effect of ivermectin and diazinon treatment on mange infestation in camels
| Group | D0 | D7 | D14 | D21 | D28 | D42 | D56 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPA | ENM | NPA | ENM | NPA | ENM | NPA | ENM | NPA | ENM | NPA | ENM | NPA | ENM | |
| Ivermectin | 6 | ++ | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| Diazinon | 6 | ++ | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 1 | + |
| Infested untreated | 6 | ++ | 6 | + | 6 | ++ | 6 | + | 0 | + | 6 | ++ | 6 | ++ |
| Healthy untreated | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 1 | + |
+: 1–10 mites; ++: 10–100 mites; −: No mites; n (number of animals in each group) = 6; D = day; D0 = the day treatment commenced; NPA = Number of Positive animals; ENM = Estimated number of mites