Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Virol. 2013 Sep 26;58(4):678–682. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.09.019

Table 1.

Concordance between rectal swab and bulk stool specimens for detection of rotavirus, Santa Rosa, Guatemala, 2009.

Concordant Specimens
Discordant Specimens
P-valuea
Swab+/bulk+ Swab−/bulk− Total
concordance
(95% CI)
Swab+/bulk− Swab−/Bulk+ Total
discordance
(95% CI)
Characteristic
Overall (n = 100) 47 44 91% (85–97%) 4 5 9% (3–15%) 0.8
Age group
<1 year (n = 40) 19 18 93% (84–100%) 0 3 8% (0–16%) 0.1
1 to <2 years (n = 39) 19 14 85% (73–96%) 4 2 15% (4–27%) 0.5
2 to <5 years (n = 21) 9 12 100% (NA) 0 0 0% 1.0
Healthcare setting
Ambulatory (n = 38) 16 18 89% (80–99%) 1 3 11% (1–20%) 0.4
Hospital (n = 62) 31 26 92% (85–99%) 3 2 8% (1–15%) 0.7
Clinical characteristic
Onset <1.5 days (n = 50) 24 22 92% (84–100%) 2 2 8% (0–16%) 1.0
Current diarrhea (n = 89) 42 39 91% (85–97%) 4 4 9% (3–15%) 1.0
Vomiting (n = 75) 38 30 91% (84–97%) 3 4 9% (3–16%) 0.7
<1 year old + vomiting (n = 30) 14 13 90% (79–100%) 0 3 10% (0–21%) 0.1

CI = confidence interval; NA = not applicable.

a

Based on McNemar test for difference between paired proportions (specimen type).