Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Virol. 2013 Sep 26;58(4):678–682. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.09.019

Table 2.

Concordance between rectal swab and bulk stool specimens for detection of norovirus, Santa Rosa, Guatemala, 2009.

Concordant specimens
Discordant specimens
P–valuea
Swab+/bulk+ Swab−/bulk− Total
concordance
(95% CI)
Swab+/bulk− Swab−/Bulk+ Total
discordance
(95% CI)
Characteristic
Overall (n = 100) 8 78 86% (79–93%) 8 6 14% (7–21%) 0.6
Age group
<1 year (n = 41) 5 28 80% (68–93%) 5 3 20% (7–32%) 0.5
1 to <2 years (n = 39) 3 31 87% (77–98%) 3 2 13% (2–23%) 0.7
2 to <5 years (n = 20) 0 19 95% (85–100%) 0 1 5% (0–15%) 0.5
Healthcare setting
Ambulatory (n = 37) 1 31 86% (75–98%) 4 1 14% (3–25%) 0.2
Hospital (n = 63) 7 47 86% (77–94%) 4 5 14% (6–23%) 0.7
Clinical characteristic
Onset <1.5 days (n = 50) 3 38 82% (71–93%) 5 4 18% (7–29%) 0.8
Current diarrhea (n = 89) 7 68 84% (77–92%) 8 6 16% (8–23%) 0.6
Vomiting (n = 76) 8 59 88% (81–95%) 4 5 12% (5–19%) 0.8
<1 year old with vomiting (n = 31) 5 22 87% (75–99%) 2 2 13% (1–25%) 1.0

CI = confidence interval; NA = not applicable.

a

Based on McNemar test for difference between paired proportions (specimen types).