Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aerosol Sci Technol. 2013;47(9):1047–1057. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2013.814911

TABLE 3.

Droplet nuclei concentrations for various particle sizes flushed using the flushometer toilet (n = 6 trials per condition)

Particle size (μm) Mean (SEM*) bowl water preflush concentration (particles/mL) Mean (SEM*) airborne particle concentration produced (particles/m3) Mean (SEM*) airborne particle generation rate (airborne particles produced per 100 million particles present in the bowl preflush)
0.25 5.073 × 108 (7.427 × 107) 512.6 (44.0) 0.235 (0.029)
0.50 1.679 × 108 (2.028 × 107) 65.8 (18.4) 0.092 (0.034)
1.0 2.035 × 107 (1.968 × 106) 10.3 (4.6) 0.113 (0.052)
1.9 1.660 × 106 (7.009 × 105) 20.1 (9.9) 8.27 (6.86)

The 0.25-μm concentration was significantly different from the 1.0- and 1.9-μm concentration but not different from the 0.50-μm concentration, and the 1.0- and 1.9-μm concentrations were not significantly different from one another. Nemenyi's test with overall α = 0.05.

*

SEM = standard error of the mean.