Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;12:51. doi: 10.1186/s12986-015-0048-8

Table 2.

Metabolic parameters in 8-week-old mice (Based on Sugimoto et al. [15].)

n NC NCM HF HFM
Body weight (g) 10–11 21.5 ± 0.2 22.2 ± 0.2 27.3 ± 0.4 *, ** 25.8 ± 0.4 *, **, ***
HOMA-R 5 1.4 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.3 8.4 ± 1.3 *, ** 4.0 ± 0.7 *, **, ***
Weight of epididymal white adipose tissue (g) 9–14 0.27 ± 0.02 0.28 ± 0.01 1.1 ± 0.08 *, ** 0.85 ± 0.04 *, **, ***
Weight of subcutaneous white adipose tissue (g) 6 0.3 ± 0.03 Not measured 1.5 ± 0.15 * 0.98 ± 0.12 *, ***
Active glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) (pg/mL) 9–15 28.2 ± 3.6 20.4 ± 2.5 38.8 ± 4.7 ** 32.0 ± 4.3
Active glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) (pg/mL) 8–9 54.8 ± 7.9 61.1 ± 4.9 66 ± 7.5 76.9 ± 14.4
Concentration of miglitol (μmol/L) 3–4 Not measured 0.06 ± 0.02 Not Measured 0.26 ± 0.13

* p < 0.05 vs NC; ** p < 0.05 vs NCM; *** p < 0.05 vs HF

Values are means ± SE for 3–15 mice. Four-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice were divided into 4 groups: a control group (NC), which was fed normal chow; a normal chow plus miglitol (NCM) group, which was fed the normal chow plus miglitol; a high fat (HF) group, which was fed the high fat diet; and a high fat plus miglitol (HFM) group, which was fed the high fat diet plus miglitol. At 8 weeks the samples were collected under fasting conditions. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey-Kramer post-hoc comparisons were performed for multiple comparisons