Table 2.
Specific growth rate, biomass productivity, and FAME content of WT and two NsbHLH2 transformants
| Culture condition | Strain | Specific growth rate (day−1)a | Biomass productivity (mg/L/day) | FAME content (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0–4b | Day 4–8c | Day 8–12d | 8 day | 12 day | 8 day | 12 day | ||
| Normal | WT | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 89.6 ± 8.8 | 168.8 ± 10.4 | 15.6 ± 0.8 | 21.7 ± 0.9 |
| 3–6 | 0.59 ± 0.03** | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 121.9 ± 11.5* | 176.0 ± 9.7 | 16.5 ± 0.7 | 24.5 ± 1.2 | |
| 3–11 | 0.67 ± 0.03** | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 133.3 ± 23.0 | 170.8 ± 9.9 | 16.5 ± 1.1 | 24.1 ± 1.6 | |
| N limitation | WT | 0.40 ± 0.04 | 0.36 ± 0.36 | 78.1 ± 2.4 | 42.3 ± 1.4 | |||
| 3–6 | 0.64 ± 0.02** | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 96.3 ± 5.4* | 46.0 ± 3.3 | ||||
| 3–11 | 0.60 ± 0.03** | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 93.7 ± 6.3* | 41.5 ± 1.2 | ||||
| Osmotic stress | WT | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 102.1 ± 12.3 | 168.7 ± 12.1 | 17.2 ± 0.9 | 30.1 ± 3.0 |
| 3–6 | 0.46 ± 0.04 | 0.47 ± 0.05 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 126.0 ± 15.9 | 180.1 ± 4.9 | 17.8 ± 1.2 | 32.5 ± 3.8 | |
| 3–11 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 131.2 ± 19.6 | 153.1 ± 4.6 | 17.2 ± 0.4 | 29.9 ± 4.7 | |
The data points represent the average of samples and error bars indicate standard error (n = 4). Significant differences, as determined by Student’s t test, are indicated by asterisks (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001)
aSpecific growth rate was calculated as (μ/day) = ln(X 2/X 1)/(t 2 − t 1); where X 1 and X 2 are the initial and final biomass and t 1 and t 2 are the initial and final times
bSpecific growth rate based on cell density on day 0 and day 4
cSpecific growth rate based on cell density on day 4 and day 8
dSpecific growth rate based on cell density on day 8 and day 12