Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Aug;38(8):1118–1127. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000246

TABLE 3.

Associations between EGFR/KRAS mutations and histologic subtypes/mucinous features

Variable Mutation, n (%)
P-value (overall) P-value (pairwise comparison)
Wild-type EGFR KRAS EGFR vs. wild-type KRAS vs. wild-type EGFR vs. KRAS
Histologic subtype
 Lepidic predominant group 72 (55) 31 (24) 27 (21) 0.019 0.011 0.72 0.011
 Nonlepidic 419 (60) 96 (14) 177 (26)
 Acinar 180 (60) 54 (18) 66 (22) 0.18
 Nonacinar 311 (60) 73 (14) 138 (26)
 Papillary 76 (50) 29 (19) 46 (30) 0.032 0.063 0.029 1.00
 Nonpapillary 415 (62) 98 (15) 158 (24)
 Micropapillary 49 (63) 7 (9) 22 (28) 0.23
 Nonmicropapillary 442 (59) 120 (16) 182 (24)
 Solid 114 (70) 6 (4) 43 (26) <0.001 <0.001 0.62 <0.001
 Nonsolid 377 (57) 121 (18) 161 (24)
 Cribriform 26 (77) 4 (12) 4 (12) 0.11
 Noncribriform 465 (59) 123 (16) 200 (25)
Mucinous feature
 Signet-ring cell feature 35 (56) 8 (13) 19 (31) 0.52
 Non–signet-ring cell feature 456 (60) 119 (16) 185 (24)
 Extracellular mucin 58 (50) 7 (6) 51 (44) <0.001 0.050 <0.001 <0.001
 Nonextracellular mucin 433 (61) 120 (17) 153 (22)

Lepidic-predominant group includes nonmucinous adenocarcinoma in situ, nonmucinous minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, and lepidic-predominant invasive adenocarcinoma.

Significant P-values are shown in bold.

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure