Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 15;257:34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.09.010

Table 3.

Associations between PVS computational count & volume (ml), and WMH Visual Rating Scores (i.e., PVH and DWMH Fazekas scores) of baseline scans in 100 patients with mild stroke.

Association (PVS computational count & volume ∼ predictor) Coefficient of change in PVS per unit change in predictor 95% confidence intervals p Value
PVS computational count ∼ WMH visual rating scores (Fazekas total) 0.065 (0.034, 0.096) <0.001
PVS computational count ∼ WMH visual rating scores PVH 2.199 (1.215, 3.182) <0.001
PVS computational count ∼ WMH visual rating scores DWMH 1.919 (0.990, 2.848) <0.001
PVS volume ∼ WMH visual rating scores (Fazekas total) 8.895E − 04 (5.235E − 04, 1.256E − 03) <0.001
PVS volume ∼ WMH visual rating scores PVH 0.027 (0.015, 0.039) <0.001
PVS volume ∼ WMH visual rating scores DWMH 0.019 (0.008, 0.031) 0.001